Carolina Savings Bank v. McMahon
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Izlar, J., Charleston, April, 1892. This was an appeal by H. A. Heiser from a decree directing Mm to comply with Ms bid for a lot of land sold in April, 1892, under order of the court in the case of Carolina Savings; Bank against Ellen McMahon, as administratrix of John Me-. Mahon, and others.
Read the full summary
Before Izlar, J., Charleston, April, 1892. This was an appeal by H. A. Heiser from a decree directing Mm to comply with Ms bid for a lot of land sold in April, 1892, under order of the court in the case of Carolina Savings; Bank against Ellen McMahon, as administratrix of John Me-. Mahon, and others. Master Sass, to whom the matter had been referred to take and report the testimony, with his conclusions of law and fact, reported as follows: I find first, as matters of fact: That one Joseph Johnson, on August 15th, 1839, by deed duly recorded, conveyed to Patrick McBride the fee to the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered toy
Mr. Chief Justice MoIver.
Under proper proceedings in this case for the foreclosure of a mortgage given by one John McMahon, the intestate of defendant Ellen, a certain house and lot in the city of Charleston was offered for sale by the master, and bid off by the appellant, H. A. Heiser. He having failed to comply with the terms of the sale, a rule was issued against him, to show cause why he should not be required to do so. To this rule the appellant made return, setting forth certain objections to the title to the premises which he bid off, and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Berry v. Marion County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Penienskice v. ShortSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
- McCreary v. CoggeshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Sumter Fertilizer Manufacturing Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945