Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J. L. C.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2008No. A08A0679PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Following a hearing, the juvenile court terminated the father’s parental rights to J. L. C.1 In his sole enumeration of error, the father *764contends that the requirements of OCGA § 15-11-94 were not met and thus the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights. For the following reasons, we affirm.

In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a termination of parental rights case, the question is whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent’s rights to custody have been lost. In making that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R. C. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. In the Interest of S. L. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. In the Interest of J. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. In the Interest of D. D. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. In the Interest of R. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In the Interest of M. S. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. In the Interest of D. L. T. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. In the Interest of T. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. In the Interest of C. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. In the Interest of A. J. D. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API