Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BTD-1996, NPC 1 L.L.C. v. 350 Warren L.P.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 3, 2000Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

STEINBERG, J.A.D.,

concurring in part; dissenting in part.

I agree with the conclusion of the majority that the charge imposed by the sheriff in this case is technically a tax, rather than a fee, because of the gross disproportion between the amount charged and the value of the services actually performed and expenditures actually involved, as stipulated by the parties. Indeed, although in a different context, the Supreme Court has held that the charges imposed under N.J.S.A. 22A:4-8 constitutes a tax rather than a fee where there is a gross disparity between the amount charged and the services…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority v. McCraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Kingsley v. Hawthorne Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API