Legal Opinion
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Weber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 13, 1976No. 46140PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David E. Marsden, Justice. *
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a declaratory judgment finding that it was obligated to defend its insureds, Robert and Jerome Weber, in a personal injury action brought by David Weber who was injured in an accident near the family farm. We affirm.
The facts are not in dispute. David is the son of Robert and the nephew of Jerome Weber. At the time of this accident, Robert and Jerome Weber operated certain farms as a partnership. David, a 14-year-old school boy at the time of the accident, would occasionally help with the work, but without regularly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Kook v. American Sur. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Gorczyca v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Lowry v. KneelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arndt v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Center Mutual Insurance Co. v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ARC Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Home Mutual Insurance Co. v. ThalmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Arndt v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.