Legal Opinion · Dissent

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Whetstone

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 16, 1963No. 18089Published

1DissentBrailsford, Justice

The opinion in this case, although recognizing that there are exceptions to the rule denying indemnity as between joint tort-feasors, throws plaintiff’s claim out of court without a trial. Being convinced that the allegations of the complaint will support the proof of facts constituting a cause of action for indemnity, under exceptions to the general rule which are logical, just and fully supported by authority, I respectfully dissent.

Merryweather v. Nixan, 1799, 8 Tr. 186, 101 Eng. Reprint 1337, is credited wtih having established the rule against contribution between joint tort-feasors.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API