Morris v. Franklin Fire Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This action is brought upon, or in connection with, a certain policy of fire insurance known as Furriers’ Customers Basic Policy, dated September 14, 1939. The action, although the parties have not so treated it, is an action to reform the policy of insurance because of mistake and to enforce the policy as reformed by awarding to the customers the amount of their respective losses due to a fire occurring November 30, 1939. The policy as written and as set forth as an exhibit to the complaint does not, it is alleged, cover the loss suffered by any of the customers who…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- C. E. Carnes & Co. v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd. of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- McDaniel v. TraylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ballard v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- MUTUAL BEN. HEALTH & ACCIDENT ASS'N v. FortenberryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Ackman v. Northern States Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. BusbyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1950
- Cather v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., Ltd., of London, EnglandDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1950
- Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Wilson's Pool Design, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023