Legal Opinion
Ayers v. Tyson Poultry, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided March 14, 2018No. CV–17–765PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge *125Herbert Ayers appeals the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission's (Commission) order reversing the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision and finding that he is not entitled to additional medical treatment for a compensable low-back injury he suffered in 2002. We affirm.
Ayers, a sixty-seven-year-old man, began working for Tyson Poultry, Inc., as a truck driver in the late 1990s. He suffered a compensable back injury in May 2002. Ayers returned to work with permanent lifting restrictions. In May 2006, Ayers suffered another compensable low-back injury in a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Martin Charcoal, Inc. v. BrittCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Williams v. Prostaff TemporariesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- University of Central Arkansas and Public Employee Claims Division v. Elizabeth SriteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
- Alma Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. Jamestown Health and Rehab, LLC, and Amtrust North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019