Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Russell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 33,267Published

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff, in his own behalf, and as assignee -of others, filed the bill of complaint herein to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien on real estate in the city of Ypsilanti, Michigan. A decree was entered for plaintiff, and defendant John A. Burtis appeals. It does not appear that plaintiff and his assignors, or any of them, performed any service or furnished any materials in pursuance of any contract with the owner, part owner, or lessee of the real estate, or of any interest therein, here involved. There is no basis for a mechanic’s lien. Section 14796, 3 Comp. Laws 1915; Merrill v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merrill v. BrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. John Wallace Sons Co. v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API