Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Brant

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1913No. Docket Nos. 142 and 143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Berrien; Coolidge, J. Bills by Levitt L. Merrill and others and by Richard Hill and others against Edward Brant and others for the enforcement of mechanics’ liens, the suits being consolidated by consent. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Bird,' J.

The bill of complaint in this cause was filed to enforce several mechanics’ liens against the Hotel Benton in the city of Benton Harbor. Certain changes and repairs were made in the interior of the hotel in February and March, 1910, involving an expenditure of about $1,000, in which the carpenter, the mason, the plumber, and the decorator participated. Failing to receive all their pay, they filed liens under the statute and are now seeking to enforce them in this suit. By stipulation of the parties, the cases were tried and disposed of as one, and it is stipulated that the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wagar v. BriscoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Peninsular General Electric Co. v. NorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mahoning Park Co. v. Warren Home Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Queal Lumber Co. v. LipmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. John Wallace Sons Co. v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Merithew v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Sewell v. Nu Markets, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API