Legal Opinion

Kieferdorf v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1944No. 10484PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

The question here is whether petitioner is liable as a transferee under Section 311 of the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 311, for income taxes due from the decedent whose estate is insolvent by reason of petitioner’s receipt of insurance proceeds under a California statute authorizing the probate court to set over to the surviving spouse all or any part of the property of the decedent “exempt from execution”. The insurance proceeds were payable to the estate and were property “exempt from execution” under California law.

The facts were found…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Pond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  3. Staley v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Parrott Estate Co. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. United States v. HowellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1881

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ruth Halle Rowen, Ethel F. Halle, and Edward Halle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Shaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. HeffronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Jones v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  5. Diamond v. SturrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API