Legal Opinion

Mann v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 12, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 5110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*692MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action for personal injuries by an agent of the Tennessee alcoholic beverage commission under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2674 and 2671. It was tried by the Court without a jury on March 14, 1968. Trial briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of- law have now been filed by opposing counsel.

For some time prior to February 2, 1967, the Tennessee alcoholic beverage commission and the alcohol and tobacco tax division of the Internal Revenue Service, federal Treasury Department, had been engaged in a hybrid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Mahoney v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
  3. Wilson v. MoudyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  4. Grizzard and Cuzzort v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  5. Hopper v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. Thurston Motor LinesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  2. In Re Bomb Disaster at Roseville, Cal., on April 28District Court, E.D. California · 1977
  3. Russell v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API