Mutchnik, Inc. Construction v. Dimmerman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, C.J.
Mutchnik, Inc. Construction appeals the entry of an adverse final judgment, arguing that the trial court based its decision on an affirmative defense, working without a building permit, which had not been raised by the pleadings. We agree with Mutchnik’s argument and reverse.
This case arises out of a dispute over payment for labor and construction. Mutchnik formed an oral contract -with appellees Robert and Rochelle Dimmer-man for construction on their Miami Beach property. Mutchnik alleged that, after performing about $17,000 worth of work and submitting an invoice, the Dimmer-mans locked…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- ARKY, FREED v. Bowmar Instrument Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. v. V-Strategic Group, LLCSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Carroll & Associates, PA v. GalindoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- In Re Estate of HatcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of New York Trust Co., N.A. v. RodgersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Bank of New York Trust Co., N.A. v. RodgersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012