Legal Opinion
Tompkins v. Hardison
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 27, 1923No. 14747PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “A brief of' the evidence must be filed by the movant with the motion to reinstate a ease in which a nonsuit has been awarded and the case dismissed for want of sufficient evidence.” City of Atlanta v. Jenkins, 137 Ga. 454 (2) (73 S. E. 402); City of Atlanta v. Miller, 125 Ga. 495 (54 S. E. 538). Such an approved brief of evidence, as in a motion for new trial (Taylor v. Tanner, 143 Ga. 18, 84 S. E. 68), is an indispensable part of such a motion to reinstate; and if the brief is not prepared and presented by the movant as provided *277in the orders for hearing, the motion to reinstate may be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Price v. High & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Albany & Northern Railway Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Bugg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- City of Atlanta v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- City of Atlanta v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Camp v. Curry-Arrington Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Nixon v. Growers Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Wood v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Elrod v. OglesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.