Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 9, 2014No. 13-2952-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge:

To satisfy terrorism-related judgments against Iran, the district court (Forrest, J.) awarded turnover of $1.75 billion in assets under both the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (“TRIA”) and a statute enacted specifically to address the assets at issue in this case, 22 U.S.C. § 8772. Although Iran argues that the TRIA ownership requirements have not been satisfied, we need not reach this issue in light of Congress’s enactment of § 8772. Iran concedes that the statutory elements for turnover of the assets under § 8772 have been satisfied, and we reject…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Breard v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bank Markazi v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Kirschenbaum v. 650 Fifth Avenue & Related PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Glenn v. FayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Strauss v. LyonnaisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API