Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge:
To satisfy terrorism-related judgments against Iran, the district court (Forrest, J.) awarded turnover of $1.75 billion in assets under both the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (“TRIA”) and a statute enacted specifically to address the assets at issue in this case, 22 U.S.C. § 8772. Although Iran argues that the TRIA ownership requirements have not been satisfied, we need not reach this issue in light of Congress’s enactment of § 8772. Iran concedes that the statutory elements for turnover of the assets under § 8772 have been satisfied, and we reject…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Breard v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bank Markazi v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Kirschenbaum v. 650 Fifth Avenue & Related PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Glenn v. FayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Strauss v. LyonnaisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.