Legal Opinion
Breitenbach v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided August 20, 1998No. CIV.A. 1:96-CV-2195-RWSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STORY, District Judge.
This ease is before the court for consideration of the Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Bill of Costs [39-1]. Summary judgment was granted to Defendant by an order entered on June 9, 1998. On July 10, 1998, the Clerk taxed costs of $18,502.11 against Plaintiff. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) provides that on motion served within 5 days after the clerk taxes costs, costs may be reviewed by the court. Plaintiffs objections were due July 17, 1998. Plaintiff filed his brief in opposition to the bill of costs on July 24, 1998. “Plaintiffs motion is therefore…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- John F. Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, John F. Loughan, Cross-Appellee v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- DeSisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-In-The-HillsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
- Fressell v. AT & T Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W&O, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- U.S. EEOC v. W & O, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Kenny A. Ex Rel. Winn v. PerdueDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
- U.S. EEOC v. W & O, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Breitenbach v. Neiman Marcus GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.