Legal Opinion

Chadrow v. Kellman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1954No. Appeal, 151PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

Appellant is the claimant of the contents of a safe deposit box in the joint names of a decedent and her own. The court below ruled that claimant did not establish ownership of the contents under a valid inter vivos gift since there was no delivery, actual or constructive, sufficient to divest donor of all dominion over such property and invest donee with ownership, possession or control. The appeal followed.

The hearing judge made the following findings of fact, which are not disputed:

*239“On May 4, 1950, William Chadrow [decedent] rented a safe deposit box,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Furjanick EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Appeal of WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Mardis, Administratrix v. SteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Mader v. StemlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Flanagan v. NashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. King EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Brightbill v. BoeshoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Martella EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Brose EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Secary EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API