Chadrow v. Kellman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
Appellant is the claimant of the contents of a safe deposit box in the joint names of a decedent and her own. The court below ruled that claimant did not establish ownership of the contents under a valid inter vivos gift since there was no delivery, actual or constructive, sufficient to divest donor of all dominion over such property and invest donee with ownership, possession or control. The appeal followed.
The hearing judge made the following findings of fact, which are not disputed:
*239“On May 4, 1950, William Chadrow [decedent] rented a safe deposit box,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Furjanick EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Appeal of WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Mardis, Administratrix v. SteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Mader v. StemlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Flanagan v. NashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- King EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Brightbill v. BoeshoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Martella EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Brose EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Secary EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.