Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Leiby

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Fourth District.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

The District Court based its decree, setting aside the money judgment of September, 1851, on the ground, that such judgment could not be rendered in a suit for the foreclosure of a mortgage. In this respect the Court erred. In this State, parties are at lib*157erty to adopt, in the foreclosure of mortgages the course pursued under the old Chancery system, and take a decree adjudging the amount due upon the personal obligation of the mortgagor, and directing a sale of the premises, and the application of the proceeds to its payment; and apply, after sale, for the ascertainment of any deficiency,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rollins v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Englund v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Cormerais v. GenellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Bull v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Schafer v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API