Legal Opinion
Nuveen Premium Income Municipal Fund 4, Inc. v. Morgan Keegan & Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 2002No. Civ-00-935-HEPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEATON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs instituted this action for damages against Defendants for alleged fraud, negligent misrepresentations, fraudulent non-disclosure and violations of 71 Okla. Stat. § 408, stemming from the sale of certain municipal bonds issued in Oklahoma. Defendant Morgan Keegan & Company,. Inc. (hereinafter “Morgan Kee-gan”) filed a motion to determine applicable law, a motion for summary judgment with regard to its alleged status as an underwriter in the securities transactions at issue and a motion for summary judgment with regard to alleged misrepresentations. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ortiz v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- A.S. GOLDMEN & COMPANY, INC. v. NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Lintz v. Gulf Partners Ltd.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985
- Simms Investment Co. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., Investment LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- State v. LundbergCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
- State v. Lundberg (Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2017