Legal Opinion · Dissent

Seymour v. County of Saratoga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 20, 1993Published

1Dissent

Mercure, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. In my view, a fair reading of Resolution No. 86 of 1991 supports respondent’s contention that its adoption does not constitute an "action” which would trigger the need for an environmental impact statement (hereinafter EIS; see, ECL 8-0105 [4], [5]; 6 NYCRR 617.2 [b]; 617.3 [c] [1]). To the contrary, the resolution selects a preferred primary site for construction of a proposed County-wide landfill and, as such, constitutes mere preliminary planning which does not commit respondent to commence, engage in or approve the project (see, 6 NYCRR…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Citizens for an Orderly Energy Policy, Inc. v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Programming & Systems, Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Town of Dryden v. Tompkins County Board of RepresentativesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. City of Ithaca v. Tompkins County Board of RepresentativesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. McKelvey v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API