Programming & Systems, Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
An environmental impact statement mandated by ECL 8-0109 must be prepared and made available to the public before “any significant authorization is granted for a specific proposal.” (Matter of Tri-County Taxpayers Assn. v Town Bd., 55 NY2d 41, 47.) While preliminary steps in the planning of the 42nd Street Development Project have been taken, an environmental impact statement is not required until a specific project plan for the development is actually formulated and proposed. At that time, prior…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tri-County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Town Board of QueensburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by38 opinions
- Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- E.F.S. Ventures Corp. v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Citizens for an Orderly Energy Policy, Inc. v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kirk-Astor Drive Neighborhood Ass'n v. Town Board of Town of PittsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- City Council of Watervliet v. Town Board of ColonieNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.