Legal Opinion

State v. Blankenship

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1967No. 39771PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

On June 12, 1964, defendant was convicted after a jury trial of aggravated robbery in violation of Minn. St. 609.245.

Insisting that he was not the person who robbed a liquor store in St. Paul at gunpoint at about 7:30 p. m. on Wednesday, February 12, 1964, defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial. The motion was based upon multiple claims that the public defender inadequately represented him because of a failure to find and call an alleged alibi witness and that the prosecution suppressed evidence as to the name and whereabouts of such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of KapatosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. United States Ex Rel. Montgomery v. RagenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949
  3. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Stevens v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
  5. Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. HyleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. State v. BramanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. State v. OrganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API