State v. Nilsen
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
John and Anita Nilsen were convicted of attempted theft. They appealed, raising four issues, all of which the Court of Appeals decided against them. 1 CA-CR 5084, 1 CA-CR 5072, consolidated. They did not file a motion for rehearing or a petition for review.
The state cross-appealed, raising one issue, and the Court of Appeals decided against the state on that issue.
The state’s motion for rehearing was denied and we accepted its petition for review. We take jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.04 and 17 A.R.S. Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 31.19.
We approve the Court of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. MendozaArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. MontanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SouleArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State of Arizona v. Maverick Kemp GrayArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. EisenlordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State of Arizona v. Craig A. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. EisenlordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.