Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Maverick Kemp Gray

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2016No. CR-15-0293-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHIEF JUSTICE BALES,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 Consistent with Arizona’s common law, we hold that AR.S. § 13-206(A) affords a defense of entrapment only when the defendant affirmatively admits the substantial elements of the charged offense. A defendant cannot invoke this affirmative defense merely by declining to challenge the state’s evidence, even when it includes incriminating statements made by the defendant to an undercover officer.

I

¶2 In June 2013, an undercover police officer approached Maverick Gray at a bus *477stop and asked if Gray could help him get some “hard,” a slang term for crack…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State of Arizona v. Sophia Leeann RichterArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. State of Arizona v. Antajuan Stewart Carson Jr.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Kelly v. Hon blanchard/goingsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API