State of Arizona v. Maverick Kemp Gray
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE BALES,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 Consistent with Arizona’s common law, we hold that AR.S. § 13-206(A) affords a defense of entrapment only when the defendant affirmatively admits the substantial elements of the charged offense. A defendant cannot invoke this affirmative defense merely by declining to challenge the state’s evidence, even when it includes incriminating statements made by the defendant to an undercover officer.
I
¶2 In June 2013, an undercover police officer approached Maverick Gray at a bus *477stop and asked if Gray could help him get some “hard,” a slang term for crack…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Sophia Leeann RichterArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Antajuan Stewart Carson Jr.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Kelly v. Hon blanchard/goingsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.