Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1999No. 31991PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The issue before this court is whether the state breaches an agreement to concur with the recommendation of the Division of Parole and Probation by advocating in favor of the recommendation. We conclude that the state may advocate in favor of a sentence that it has agreed to recommend as part of a plea agreement so long as the state does not explicitly or implicitly seek to persuade the sentencing court to impose a harsher sentence than that which the state agreed to recommend. We further conclude that the state did not breach the plea agreement. However, we remand this case for the…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. BenchimolSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Barney Canada, A/K/A Byron Levon CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Joseph CorsentinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. GONZALES (MELVIN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Leonard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Aldape v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2023

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API