McClure v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Under the facts alleged in the answer, the note was not without consideration. It appears that the defendant executed the note and delivered it to J. H. Carmichael in order that he might negotiate it for cash to be obtained and used by the latter personally or in some enterprise with which he was connected. The defendant was an accommodation party and Carmichael was the party accommodated. Carmichael obtained money from the bank on the defendant’s note, as was contemplated by all the parties, and the furnishing of the money to him by the bank supplied the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hobbs v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Moore v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Parrott v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Vallely v. DevaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Pauly v. O'BrienU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewis v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Collins v. GWINNETT BANK & TRUST COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Gold Bond Stamp Company of Georgia, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Bradfute Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972