Shamrock-Shamrock, Inc. v. Remark
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtSasso, J.
This case presents the issue of whether Florida law imposes a duty on nonparties to litigation to preserve evidence based solely on the foreseeability of litigation. We hold that it does not and therefore affirm the summary final judgment in favor of Appellee, Tracey Remark.
Factual Background and Procedural History
Appellant, Shamrock-Shamrock, Inc. ("Shamrock"), owns property in Daytona Beach that it sought to rezone and develop into a hotel and marina. The City of Daytona Beach Zoning Department considered and denied Shamrock's rezoning request. Shamrock appealed, but the Daytona Beach…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Trevino v. OrtegaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Gracey v. EakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Rupp v. BryantSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Temple Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.