Legal Opinion
Lavali v. Lavali
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*575Defendants made a prima facie showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the subject accident by submitting the affirmed reports of their orthopedist and neurologist, who both examined plaintiff over three years after the accident, and noted full range of motion in the cervical spine, lumbar spine, and right shoulder (see Thompson v Abbasi, 15 AD3d 95, 96 [2005]). The affirmed MRI reports of the two radiologists who found mild degenerative changes and absence of disc herniations or bulges establishes prima facie lack of causation (see Depena v Sylla, 63 AD3d 504…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. AbbasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lee Yuen v. Arka Memory Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Adetunji v. U-Haul Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Depena v. SyllaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Peluso v. Janice Taxi Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robinson v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Williams v. TathamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- De Los Santos v. BasilioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- HARRITY, THERESA v. LEONE, JARED M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Robinson v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012