Legal Opinion

Bales v. Evans

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1989No. 886SC723PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

This appeal addresses the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s award of $4,000.00 in damages based on a quantum meruit theory of recovery. We find no error and affirm.

Plaintiff is a self-employed individual who does mechanic’s work and moves mobile homes. The corporate defendant (hereinafter “de fendant”) is engaged in farming operations and owns rental property and concrete companies. Plaintiff’s complaint contained, inter alia, allegations that defendant breached a contract to purchase plaintiff’s “pan,” a piece of equipment used to move topsoil and level…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Godwin Building Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Environmental Landscape Design Specialist v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Dixon, Odom & Co. v. SledgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Ellis Jones, Inc. v. Western Waterproofing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Twiford v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. United Carolina BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Stringer Oil Co., Inc. v. BoboCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Paul L. Whitfield, P.A. v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Fagen's of North Carolina, Inc. v. Rocky River Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Ben Johnson Homes, Inc. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API