Ben Johnson Homes, Inc. v. Watkins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentTyson, Judge
I concur with the result of the majority as to the corporate plaintiff. This Court is bound by the statute and the cases the majority cites, holding that acts performed by a foreign corporation during a period of suspension are invalid. I note that such an opinion treats foreign corporations, which initially complied with the law, but subsequently had certificates of authority revoked for inadvertently not filing reports, far worse than those which never complied with the law requiring a certificate of authority.
I disagree with the majority as to the individual plaintiff, Ben Johnson. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Booe v. ShadrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Whitfield v. GilchristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Potter v. Homestead Preservation Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Environmental Landscape Design Specialist v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Barrett Kays & Associates, P.A. v. Colonial Building Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.