Rother v. Monahan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From a judgment entered upon an order of the district court for Winona county, Start, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, J.1 2
The short facts alleged in the complaint are as: follows: One Siebrecht, being the owner of the land described in. *187the complaint, in July, 1889, mortgaged it to one Truesdell. In August, 1891, one Eotzler obtained a judgment against Siebrecht, which became a second lien on the land. Default having been made in the conditions of the mortgage, Truesdell foreclosed and sold the mortgaged premises on September 26, 1892, she herself being the purchaser. In January, 1893, plaintiff obtained from Truesdell an assignment of the certificate of sale on the mortgage; and in February,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hyde Park Products Corp. v. Maximilian Lerner Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mason v. SudamNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
3Cited by5 opinions
- Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Plute v. SchickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Roberts v. MeighenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914