Legal Opinion

Borowski v. Sargent

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1933No. 29,255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Suing on her behalf to recover damages suffered by his minor daughter and caused by defendant’s automobile, plaintiff met with an adverse verdict and appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict after plaintiff’s motion for new trial had been denied.

Late in the afternoon of July 14, 1930, plaintiff’s daughter Gloria, then just over five years of age, was struck by an automobile driven by defendant’s son. The accident occurred on a street in Fairmont. It is not contended that a conclusion that the driver was not negligent -would be against the evidence. Apparently the jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oertel v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Decker v. Itasca Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Hughes v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Hannula v. Duluth & Iron Range RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Converse v. AdlemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Warning v. KANABEC COUNTY CO-OPERATIVE OIL ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Warning v. KANABEC COUNTY CO-OPERATIVE OIL ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API