Leask v. Hoagland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Ellen B. Hill and another, from portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 4th day 'of August, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term, with notice of an intention to bring np for review an order awarding a farther allowance to the plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the Court
Dowling, J.:
Hudson Hoagland, a resident of the county of Hew York, died on January 30, 1904, leaving a last will and testament whereof the plaintiffs are executors, and by which his nephew, Charles F. Hoagland, became entitled to share in his residuary estate. This share has been assigned in part to various persons, and it is to determine the amounts respectively due them, as well as to establish certain alleged offsets due the estate, that the executors have brought' this action. The will is dated Hovember 18, 1903, a codicil thereto was made on December 9, 1903, and both were admitted to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grey v. . GreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Stimson v. . VromanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Leask v. HoaglandNew York Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re MeekerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- Hoxsey v. HoffpauirCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- In re the Estate of GraceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
- In re the Estate of LynchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Will of HartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.