Legal Opinion

M. B. Guran Co. v. Amsdell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1983No. 10863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, J.

The defendant, Robert J. Amsdell, d.b.a. Amsdell Construction Company, appeals from a judgment rendered by the court of common pleas which confirmed an award made by an arbitration panel selected by the parties. We affirm.

On October 20, 1979, plaintiff, M. B. Guran Company, Inc. (“Guran”), and Amsdell Construction Company entered into an agreement which provided that Guran would supply the materials and perform the work for the completion of a project referred to as the “U-Store-It-Site” in Jackson Township. Article 19 of the agreement provided that any dispute arising out of the contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Local Union No. 200, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Librascope Inc. v. Precision Lodge No. 1600, International Ass'n of MacHinistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. District Lodge No. 71 of International Ass'n of MacHinists v. Bendix Corp., Kansas City DivisionDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martich v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Constructora Estelar, S.E. v. Autoridad De Edificios PúblicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
  3. Constructora Estelar, S.E. v. Autoridad de Edificios PúblicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API