Legal Opinion

Baqleh v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 2002No. A097680PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

If during the pendency of a criminal action and prior to judgment counsel informs the court he or she believes the defendant is or may be mentally incompetent, the court shall suspend the criminal proceedings and order that the question of the defendant’s mental competence be determined at a trial of that question by court or jury. (Pen. Code, § 1368.) Thereafter, “[t]he court shall appoint a psychiatrist or licensed psychologist, and any other expert the court may deem appropriate, to examine the defendant.” (§ 1369, subd. (a).)

This case presents the questions whether a…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. People v. BuenrostroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Centeno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. JablonskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. PokovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API