Legal Opinion
In Re Frost
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 5, 1990No. C-2-89-246PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
This appeal arises from the Chapter 13 proceeding of debtors Harold and Catherine Frost. The debtors’ Chapter .13 plan was confirmed on August 31, 1987. However, the debtors subsequently sought to modify their Chapter 13 plan so as to reclassify their loan obligation to appellant Atlantic Financial Federal (hereinafter “Atlantic”) from wholly secured to partially secured and to reduce the dividend on general, unsecured claims. Appellant Atlantic opposed the debtors’ motion. The bankruptcy court held a hearing on the proposed modification and then…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Frank and Arlene Wilson v. Commonwealth Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- In Re Estel Ray Hougland, Ruth Evelyn Hougland, Debtors. Estel Ray Hougland Ruth Evelyn Hougland v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Creditor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re RimmerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1992
- In Re DukeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1993
- In Re BellamyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- In Re KlusUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- In Re TownleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.