Legal Opinion

Millaudon v. Allard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 15, 1831PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COTJRT OP THE FIRST DISTRICT. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court by

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

This was a case of a writ of seizure and sale by the mortgagee. The premises were sold. The Planters Bank of Georgia intervened, being a posterior mortgagee.

The district court was of opinion that as the defendant, the third possessor, had had the mortgaged premises adjudicated to himself, there was no sale, as they were his before the adjudication, and he could not purchase his own thing. The proceedings in the case presented no obstacle to the exercise of the intervening parties right as a mortgagee, and he directed a writ of seizure and sale to issue in his, favor.

From this judgment the…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Pugh v. SampleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. Fontelieu v. FontelieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Cook v. LemoineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  5. Third District Bldg. Ass'n v. ForschlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API