Legal Opinion

State v. Schaffer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 12, 1964No. 50624PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Judge.

Defendant, a prisoner in the Missouri State Penitentiary, instituted this proceeding under the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., by the filing of a pro se motion to set aside a judgment and sentence wherein he had been adjudged guilty of forcible rape. In the original trial the court found as charged, that defendant had been convicted of a prior felony. Defendant’s punishment was fixed by the court .at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 99 years. Upon appeal to this court the judgment was affirmed. State v. Schaffer, Mo.Sup., 354 S.W.2d 829.

Upon the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roosevelt Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. State v. CernySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. State v. CernySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hemphill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. KeebleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Russell v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966
  5. Gerberding v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API