Legal Opinion

Bell v. NuSil Technology, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 8, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00061Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHAN BELL, individually and on behalf ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0061- NONE JLT of members of the general public similarly ) 12 situated, ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION ) TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT HIS 13 Plaintiff, ) INITIAL DISCLOSURES ) 14 v. ) (Doc. 14) ) 15 NUSIL TECHNOLOGY LLC, et al., ) ) 16 Defendants. ) ) 17 18 Nathan Bell is a former employee of Nusil Technology and Avantar Performance Materials and 19 asserts Defendants failed to compensate him—and other employees—for all hours worked and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Tutor-Saliba Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
  2. Frontline Medical Associates, Inc. v. Coventry Health CareDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  3. Bullard v. Roadway ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API