Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1969No. Civ. 24560PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

Appellant Earl L. Schmidt filed an action against respondent Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company seeking declaratory relief concerning his rights under a policy of insurance issued by respondent and entitled “New Accident and Sickness Disability Benefits” policy. After a hearing and an examination of the policy the trial court concluded that appellant was not entitled to relief and entered judgment to that effect. From our review of the record and consideration of the applicable principles of law we have reached a contrary conclusion and therefore reverse the judgment, with directions to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Neal v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Ponder v. Blue Cross of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API