Hoefling v. Hambleton
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. Gf. H. Hoonan. Ho statement is necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
— This suit was brought by the appellees to recover $350 alleged to be due them as their commission upon a sale of real estate belonging to the appellant.
The cause was tried without a jury, and a judgment for $325 was rendered for the plaintiffs.
The defendant employed plaintiffs, who were real estate agents, to find a purchaser for the land, agreeing to pay them 5 per cent upon the sum for which the land should be sold, for their services. The plaintiffs caused the land to be advertised, and entered into negotiations with and showed the land to the Mullaly brothers,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McMaster v. . Pres., Etc., Ins. Co. of N. Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thornell v. Missouri State Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Johnson v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Service Finance v. Adriatic Ins. Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Berg v. San Antonio Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Averill v. O'FarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.