Legal Opinion

City of Medina v. Rose

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1966No. 38589PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langenbach, J. †

This is an appeal from a conviction for a violation of a city ordinance zoning a certain area for family dwellings into lots containing 20,000 square feet. There were two counts and two convictions.

Count 1 charged the offense of subdividing land improved with a dwelling, decreasing the minimum lot area for such dwelling below that required by the land use regulation of the city. Count 2 charged the offense of procuring the issuance of building permit upon the site by filing, or causing to be filed as his act, a plot plan misrepresenting the entire tract.

By ordinance No. 16 the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Weiks v. Town of TumwaterWashington Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shelton v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sabo v. Monroe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Chestnut Hill Co. v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. City of Philadelphia v. ShanahanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Bevans ex rel. BevansSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API