Legal Opinion
Hill v. Equitable Bank, National Ass'n
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 4, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 82-220 CMWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion to determine the admissibility at trial of the depositions of Martin Mason and Richard Ward pursuant to Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and in accordance with Rule 804 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. DEPOSITION OF MARTIN MASON
Under Rule 32, the deposition of a witness, whether or not a party, is admissible at trial provided, inter alia, that the witness resides at a distance greater than 100 miles from the trial or hearing. Mr. Mason resides in Derry, New Hampshire, over 100 miles from Wilmington,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. State University Construction FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Hill v. Equitable Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Deloro Smelting & Refining Co. v. Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1970
- Lee v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cook v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Schwartz v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Lyman v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- J.A. Moore Construction Co. v. Sussex Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009