Legal Opinion
Lee v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 17, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-20PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Ralph W. Lee, III, seeks a declaratory judgment that defendant, the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (“Ohio Casualty”), is required under an insurance policy issued to Lee by Ohio Casualty to provide a defense for him in a second action pending in the Delaware Superior Court, and to pay any judgment rendered against him therein. 1 Two motions are presently pending before this Court. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment. 2 Defendant has moved to transfer the present action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fitzgerald v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Affymetrix, Inc. v. Synteni, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Hu v. CrockettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Houk v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Midwest Motor Supply Co., Inc. v. KimballDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- New York Ex Rel. Spitzer v. Operation Rescue NationalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.