Legal Opinion

Hoenig v. Stetefeldt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated May 6, 1986, which denied his motion to restore the matter to the Trial Calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents except for Kanaje Corporation.

The Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion to restore the case to the Trial Calendar. This was the second time the action was stricken from the calendar on the plaintiff’s default in appearance and counsel admittedly did not even check on the status of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Todd Co. v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Sang Seok Na v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Rodriguez v. Hercules Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API