Sang Seok Na v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*981A plaintiff seeking to restore a case to the trial calendar more than one year after it has been marked “off,” and after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, must demonstrate the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecuting the action, a lack of intent to abandon the action, and a lack of prejudice to the defendant (see Vidal v Ricciardi, 81 AD3d 635 [2011]; Leinas v Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 72 AD3d 905, 906 [2010]; Strancewilko v Martin, 50 AD3d 671 [2008]; Basetti v Nour, 287 AD2d 126, 131 [2001]).
Here, even though the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Basetti v. NourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Fico v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Krichmar v. Queens Medical ImagingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Leinas v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bornstein v. Clearview Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Salatino v. PompaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Saint Mary Byzantine Catholic Church v. KalinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sang Seok Na v. Pulvers, Pulvers & Thompson, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Sang Seok Na v. Pulvers, Pulvers & Thompson, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Bivens v. StearnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.