Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Bales

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The defendant demurred to plaintiff’s complaint and resisted the suit upon the grounds: First, that there was no contract of sale of the land, the agreement was merely an option to purchase; second, that this is not a case for specific perform*344anee; third, that plaintiff has not complied with the terms of the agreement; fourth, that the contract, if any, was procured by fraudulent misrepresentation. Defendant’s assignments of error raise these four points. In support of defendant’s contention that the agreement is only an option, counsel for defendant cite and rely upon the cases of Sprague v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Friendly v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Oregon Home Builders v. CrowleyOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lemler v. BordOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Sprague v. SchotteOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Larrabee v. BjorkmanOregon Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Turner v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. ASPINWALL v. RyanOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Champion Et Ux. v. Hammer Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. Chatterton v. LukerIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API