Legal Opinion

Highway Sign & Servicing Co. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1932No. 29,912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to recover money under R. S. 58-101 et seq., commonly known as the bulk-sales law. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Appellant had a contract with the L. P. Benn Company, on which there was a balance due of $1,712.52. The Benn company had a stock of oil and grease which it sold in bulk to Lee Scott, appellee, for $9,000: The Benn company furnished appellee a verified list of *659its creditors. This list turned out to be incomplete. Before the sale was consummated appellee learned of some other creditors whose names…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fico, Inc. v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. McLaney v. Fortune Operating Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bradas & Gheens, Inc. v. BrewerTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API