Daniel William Sedano v. Brad Macomber
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL WILLIAM SEDANO, Case No. 1:26-cv-02862-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO STAY AND STAYING 13 v. PROCEEDINGS 14 BRAD MACOMBER, (ECF No. 2) 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, represented by counsel, is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and moved to stay pursuant to 20 Rhines v. Weber,
544 U.S. 269
(2005), because the petition is completely unexhausted.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Alfonso Blake v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Fred Jay Jackson v. Ernest C. Roe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Wooten v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.