Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
412 U.S. 218 (1973)
SCHNECKLOTH, CONSERVATION CENTER SUPERINTENDENT
v.
BUSTAMONTE.
No. 71-732.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 10, 1972.
Decided May 29, 1973.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edward P. O'Brien, Deputy Attorney General
Stuart P. Tobisman, by appointment of the Court, 405 U. S.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Stewart; Concurrence · Blackmun; Concurrence · Powell; Dissent · Douglas; Dissent · Brennan; Dissent · Marshall.
2Cases cited142 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tracy Petrocelli v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- William Kirkpatrick, Jr. v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Com. v. Arias, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Dickerson v. SamsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- State v. BramleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017