Legal Opinion
Kuhn v. Watertown Cement Products Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1955No. File 9475PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.
This action was brought in behalf of Jerome Kuhn, a minor. Jerome was injured while a silo was being constructed by defendant and it was sought to recover damages for the injury. A jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiff has appealed.
’ There is little dispute in the facts. At the time the accident-occurred Jerome was 12 years of age. He was apparently a normal boy of that age. He was visiting at the farm of his uncle, John Enders, near Wate'rtown. Jerome went to the farm on Sunday. Construction work was- started on the silo Monday morning. That morning Jerome’s uncle told him not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Corbett v. CloughSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Doyen v. LambSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Baxter v. ParkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- La Rue v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Larimore v. DobbsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Raverty v. GoetzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Cargill, Incorporated, a Foreign Corporation v. Francis Zimmer, Special Administrator of the Estate of Francis Zimmer, Jr., DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Kurtz v. SquiresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Kurtz v. SquiresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008